A Degree, Two Kids, and a Dacia

A bachelor’s degree in mathematics was once my definition of success.

I mean the degree itself. Before research, before the professional titles, before the rooms I would eventually enter, there was the possibility of finishing university. From where I was standing, that possibility was large enough to contain the whole word.

Success.

For someone else, the same degree might be a requirement on the way to the interesting part. A step before a master’s, a doctorate, a career already visible in the lives of people around them. They might finish it and feel roughly on schedule.

I could finish it and feel that something had changed in the history of my family.

The university would issue the same kind of document to both of us. It would name the qualification, the institution, and the date. There would be no space for the distance traveled before enrollment. No line for how many times continuing had seemed unreasonable. Nothing about whether the student had grown up expecting the degree or wondering whether someone like him could ever reach it.

The certificate records where you arrived.

People tend to read it as though everyone left from the same place.

Before I wanted more, this was enough#

Education did not arrive with a family instruction manual. By the time university entered the picture, I was already several unfamiliar steps beyond anything the people closest to me had done.

That is what I mean by generation zero. The difficulty begins before the milestone other people use to measure it. You are learning the path while trying to survive the path, and sometimes finding out that a next step exists is an achievement before you have taken it.

So when I say that a mathematics degree meant success to me, I am describing the size of the possibility as I could see it then.

I did not need it to be rare in the world. It was rare in the world I knew.

There is a cruelty in evaluating an earlier version of yourself using the expectations of the people you met later. You learn what comes after a degree, meet people with several, discover how much mathematics you still do not understand, and begin treating the ambition that once sustained you as if it had been embarrassingly small.

But the boy who wanted that degree had less evidence than the adult judging him. He could not borrow my later knowledge of what was possible. He had to continue with the view available to him.

I owe him a more honest account than calling his destination obvious because I eventually reached it.

The fact that I wanted to keep going afterward does not make the achievement smaller. It means reaching it changed what I could imagine next.

The Moroccan dream, as I knew it#

Around me, success also had a life attached to it.

Get the degree. Work as an elementary school teacher. Get married. Have two children. Buy a Dacia.

There it was. A future that could be explained without a second conversation.

I am describing the environment I came from, the version of the Moroccan dream I knew. Other neighborhoods, families, and circumstances produce other lists. This was the one whose meaning I could recognize immediately.

The Dacia matters because it makes the dream concrete. A degree alone is paper. A car can be parked outside. People can see that life is moving, that work has become income and income has become something useful. Marriage gives the future a familiar shape. Children give it continuity. Together, these milestones tell a story that the people around you already know how to read.

There is dignity in that story.

For someone who has lived with insecurity, a dependable life is an enormous ambition. A car can mean getting your family somewhere without depending on someone else’s schedule. A salary can mean that an ordinary expense stops becoming a household crisis. Stability can be the first opportunity to breathe after years in which every plan had to answer to money.

I understand why people want this. I understand why they want it for their children. There is nothing ridiculous about the Dacia, the marriage, or the desire to raise a family.

The difficulty begins when wanting that life for me becomes evidence that I must want it too.

The degree came with terms I had not accepted#

I wanted the mathematics degree. That did not mean I had agreed to everything the environment expected to happen after it.

From outside, those decisions could look like one continuous plan. The degree led to a job teaching elementary school, then marriage, then children, and the person became settled. Each milestone confirmed the next. You were progressing through a recognizable life.

From inside, I was discovering that the first milestone had opened questions the rest of the plan did not answer.

What could I understand if I kept studying? What kind of work would allow me to stay close to those questions? How much of the life ahead of me did I want, and how much had become familiar through repetition?

The degree had been a destination. It became an opening.

That change is difficult to explain to someone who supported the destination because they expected it to end the uncertainty. You have arrived where they thought the worrying would stop, and now you are considering another stretch of road they cannot see.

From their side, it can look as though nothing satisfies you.

From mine, I had finally reached a place where I could ask better questions about what would.

This was the contract I had not signed: education would qualify me for a particular life, and gratitude would require me to accept that life as the conclusion. Wanting the first part was treated as agreement to the whole.

Nobody needed to put the terms on paper. The sequence was familiar enough that my consent could be assumed.

A dream becomes a rule when refusal needs defending#

An expectation does not always arrive as an order. Often it arrives as a question whose answer has already been chosen.

When are you going to settle down? When will you get married? Why are you still doing this? At what point will it be enough?

The questions can be affectionate. They can come from people who want you to be safe. But repeated often enough, they make your current life feel like an explanation you have failed to finish.

You are doing something now, but the conversation keeps reaching past it toward the thing that will make you legitimate. The research becomes what you do before settling. The curiosity becomes a phase. The desire for a different life becomes something time is expected to correct.

That is where the friction lives. You are trying to make a decision, while the people around you are waiting for you to stop postponing theirs.

A shared definition of success makes a community easy to navigate. Everyone knows what to ask about, what to celebrate, and which development follows the last one. It gives people a way to care for one another without having to understand every individual ambition from the beginning.

It also gives them a way to judge.

Once the sequence becomes a measure of maturity, choosing differently requires more than explaining a preference. You have to defend your seriousness, your gratitude, sometimes your willingness to belong. The life you are living can be full of work and still be described as a life you have not started.

In the tribe’s version of belonging, a personal decision rarely stays personal for long. It becomes something the family has to explain. A familiar life spares everybody that explanation. A different one gives them questions they may never have wanted to answer.

So the pressure to follow the plan can be partly a pressure to make yourself easier to describe.

Wanting differently can sound like looking down#

There is another difficulty I do not want to pretend away.

When I say that I do not want the life someone else has built, they may hear that I think their life is beneath me. The degree, marriage, children, and car may represent years of effort to them. Refusing that future can sound like dismissing what they worked to reach.

I understand why that hurts.

I also cannot resolve the hurt by living their life as proof that I respect it.

Someone can want children with a certainty I do not share. Someone can find meaning in a stable routine that leaves me restless. Someone can choose a career for reasons that would not sustain me through its ordinary days. None of those differences requires a ranking of the people involved.

The word more makes this harder. It suggests that my ambition sits above theirs on one scale, as though research were a more advanced form of marriage or curiosity could be compared with parenthood like two salaries.

I want a different arrangement of the years available to me. Some parts may involve greater uncertainty. Other parts may involve sacrifices I would not ask anyone else to make. I cannot call it a better life in advance. I can say that choosing it honestly matters to me.

And the choice needs to remain specific. Refusing an expected sequence does not mean promising never to want any of its parts. I may want something later that I do not want now. A choice loses its freedom again if I must avoid it forever to prove that nobody chose it for me.

The problem was never that a Dacia existed in the picture.

It was the assumption that the picture was complete before I entered it.

The starting point explains the distance, not the destination#

I have to be careful with my own argument about circumstances.

If success depends on where you began, it can sound as though someone from a difficult beginning should be satisfied with less. You have already come far enough. Be grateful. Other people would be happy to have what you have.

That turns recognition into another limit.

My starting point helps explain what the mathematics degree meant. It does not decide how much further I am allowed to go. I should be able to count the achievement fully and still want something beyond it.

The same is true in the other direction. If a degree was expected in someone else’s family, that does not mean earning it required nothing from them. I cannot see their whole life from their parents’ qualifications. They may have carried difficulties I know little about. Comparing circumstances should make my judgment more careful, not give me a new competition to win.

I do not need to prove that my struggle was the largest for it to count.

What I need is a way to remember that the visible milestone and its personal meaning are different measurements. The degree says something about what I studied. The circumstances say something about what reaching it required. Neither tells me, by itself, what I should do with the rest of my life.

That decision belongs to the person who is here now.

You can leave one dream and inherit another#

Leaving the expectations of home does not leave you without an environment. It puts you near another one.

In research and technology, there are other recognizable sequences. Another qualification, a paper in the right place, recognition from people whose names you used to know only through their work. There are titles that make a room respond differently and achievements that seem ordinary because everyone around you is pursuing them.

The objects change. The ease of borrowing a definition remains.

I know how quickly something I once wanted can become the minimum I expect from myself. The accomplishment arrives, and almost immediately the mind starts measuring what has not arrived yet. The new surroundings supply the next standard before I have decided whether the last one meant what I thought it would.

It would be too flattering to call all of that curiosity.

Some of it is curiosity. I do want to understand deeply, to find gaps, to work from mathematical foundations instead of moving through techniques I cannot fully explain. That desire can survive a day in which nobody sees what I did. It can make a difficult question worth returning to even when there is no obvious announcement at the end.

Some of it can also be comparison. The desire to remain impressive in a room whose definition of impressive keeps changing. The fear that slowing down would reveal how much of my identity depends on continuing to advance.

Those feelings can travel together. I do not get to declare every ambition authentic simply because the people from home would not recognize it.

The useful question is what remains when the audience is absent. Would I still want to understand this? Would I choose the ordinary days this goal requires? Am I drawn toward the work, or toward the relief I imagine receiving when somebody finally says I have done enough?

If I never ask, I can spend years refusing an inherited contract while quietly signing another one.

What I want the word to let me keep#

I want a definition of success that can remember.

The mathematics degree should remain an achievement even after I discover more mathematics. The person I was should not have to compete with every person I later meet to keep the dignity of what he managed to do.

I also want a definition that can change. An ambition can serve a period of life and stop being the right ambition. Reaching it can reveal another possibility. Failing at it can reveal a reason to choose differently. I want to be able to respond without treating every change as evidence that the earlier years were wasted.

And I want the word to account for the life required to obtain its symbols.

A title can be impressive while the days behind it are wrong for me. A recognizable life can be comfortable while requiring me to abandon the questions that make me feel awake. An ambitious life can be equally dishonest if I keep pursuing it only because I am frightened of becoming ordinary.

The comparison has to reach the days themselves. What am I learning? What responsibilities am I carrying? Can I sustain the way I am living? Who do I have time for? What keeps getting postponed so the outside of the life can continue looking successful?

These questions do not produce a neat checklist. They require me to remain involved in choosing, including when the choice becomes inconvenient.

There is a cost to that. The familiar plan comes with people who understand it. They can recognize your progress and reassure you that you are on time. Choosing another direction can mean going longer without that reassurance. I cannot demand the freedom to make an unfamiliar life and expect everyone to know how to applaud it immediately.

But uncertainty about my own choice feels different from certainty about a life I never wanted.

The degree still counts#

I can imagine two people living what looks like the same life: the same qualification, the same car outside, children of the same age. One chose it with a fullness the other never felt. The visible milestones would not tell you the difference.

That is why the title of this essay is not a joke at the expense of a life. A degree, two kids, and a Dacia can be a beautiful answer. It can be exactly what someone wanted, honestly chosen, patiently built.

It was not a contract I was willing to sign because it happened to be the one waiting for me.

Getting a bachelor’s degree in mathematics was success from where I began. I do not need to shrink that statement to fit the expectations of people who began elsewhere. I also do not need to stop inside it to prove that I was grateful.

I wanted the degree. I earned the right to discover what I wanted after it.

The rest of the life was still mine to choose.

← all writeups